Rachel Maddow’s recent tirade against cryptocurrency, particularly bitcoin, reveals not just a lack of understanding but a willful disregard for economic reality.
Bitcoin vs. Beanie Babies: Maddow’s False Comparison Exposed
Rachel Maddow is an American television host and liberal political commentator, best known for “The Rachel Maddow Show” on MSNBC. On Thursday, following President Donald Trump’s executive order establishing a strategic bitcoin reserve, Maddow discussed the implications of this move on her program. Maddow openly admits she is “by no means a crypto expert” and that she “doesn’t know and doesn’t care” about the subject of bitcoin—yet proceeds to denounce it as a “scam” with misplaced confidence.
“I do think it’s worth looking at the crypto thing a little bit, only because it is a deeply, deeply old-fashioned, simple scam at this point, which points right to the White House,” Maddow told her audience.
To equate bitcoin with Beanie Babies is to conflate speculation with fundamental value—a grave intellectual error. Beanie Babies were mass-produced, with supply dictated by the whims of a toy manufacturer. Bitcoin, by contrast, is an immutable, decentralized monetary system with a fixed supply of 21 million coins. Its scarcity is not a marketing gimmick but an economic principle—one that mirrors the limited supply of gold, which has served as money for millennia. To dismiss this is to reject the fundamental mechanics of sound money.
During her show, Maddow claims bitcoin has “no inherent value.” This is a statement made not from reason but from ignorance of the tech itself. Bitcoin derives value from its unique properties: it is censorship-resistant, allowing individuals in oppressive regimes to store and transfer wealth without state interference. It is borderless, enabling billions of individuals to engage in the global economy. It is permissionless, meaning no central authority can control access to it. These are not the attributes of a fad like Beanie Babies; they are the hallmarks of financial sovereignty.
The claim that bitcoin’s price is dependent solely on “hype” is another fallacy Maddow pulls from her toolbox. “You get it on the ground floor now, you’ll make a bundle,” Maddow said. “It’s the whole hype. It’s the whole scam,” she added. Despite her uneducated opinion, bitcoin’s value proposition lies in its utility: it is digital property, verifiably scarce, and operates on a network that has been functional and secure for over 16 years.
Unlike Beanie Babies, bitcoin is adopted as legal tender in nations seeking alternatives to failing fiat systems. Unlike Beanie Babies, Bitcoin is mined through energy-intensive proof-of-work (PoW), anchoring its value to real-world expenditure. Unlike Beanie Babies, bitcoin’s demand is driven by its role as a hedge against inflation and censorship resistance, not ephemeral trends.
Furthermore, to label cryptocurrency as a “scam” is to reject the principle of voluntary exchange. Those who purchase bitcoin do so because they recognize its potential. No government, no central bank, no bureaucrat dictates its worth—it is determined by the free market, the purest expression of value. Dismissing this as fraudulent is a baseless attack on economic freedom itself.
Maddow’s commentary is not merely misinformed; it is an affront to reason. Bitcoin is not a toy, nor a fleeting craze—it is the foundation of a financial revolution. The sooner skeptics from the left acknowledge this, the sooner they can engage in meaningful discourse, rather than perpetuating baseless narratives.
Rachel Maddow dismisses the Strategic #Bitcoin Reserve as a “scam,” comparing it to hoarding Beanie Babies. pic.twitter.com/SKTjdnGpvu
— TFTC (@TFTC21) March 7, 2025